Educents.com

Friday, January 11, 2013

Hating Politics

I see more and more that people "hate" politics (It's the art and science of running a government. Is that what they hate? The way the government is run?).

Wrong call.

I believe that some of this "hating politics" is more of the same smartphone game, just labeled as a different app. 

It starts with the pervasive heralding of Thomas Jefferson's letter about separation of church and state. This app is ALL OVER THE PLACE (it must be a free one).

It is now somehow affecting those people who are not even IN a church or working FOR the government.  For example, a solid, long-standing organization with "American Revolution" in its title sent out a letter recently telling its members about this tenet of separating church and state.  It had been reported erroneously that they were getting rid of any mention of God or Jesus in their membership materials, and they had issued a letter refuting that.  In that letter, however, they still wrote it's important to separate religion out.  What?

I have YET to figure out in which category this organization would fit.  The test is simple - are they church?  No.  Are they state?  No.  So why are THEY taking up this banner, which isn't even part of the Constitution in the first place?

You can hate what you want. I won't question your heart. I just don't want people hating politics because it makes them appear above the fray: as if their hearts are separated from their brains.  This should not be the newest app out there, based on app 1.0.

Let's get this straight.  If you love Thomas Jefferson, I get it (I have a TJ of my own whom I adore). But he truly did just write about separation of church and state, not separation of hearts and brains. 

Please do not adopt this as your own banner.  Please, pick up a banner, any banner, and be active.  If the last ten years have taught us anything, it is that politicians DO have control over our lives, and very dear, monetary control, and so we must exercise our representative right to express our desires!!!!!!! 

And I'll give a little.  I'll let you hate politics, in one case.  Hear me out.

If you do mean, by hating politics, you hate the way the government runs, then try to affect change.  Exercise your right to be a part of this government by applying for a job in it, or running for office, or voting, or all three.  Better yet, affect more change by becoming a lobbyist.  I am not sarcastic here: it is true they hold power.  So go where there is power.  Or become a lawyer, then judge, and change society from the bench.  That looks to me like the easiest route to bigger power. [Religious interlude: I answer to an even higher power, but I don't think even He wants us to roll over and play dead]

But even after all these attempts, if you have tried and tried and tried, and finally, on your death bed, can do no more, you hate it, you can.  But then and only then give up! 

Don't fall for this "I hate politics" mantra [because my heart is separated from my brain and therefore I am above it all] - affect change within this amorphous mass.  I believe that is the most effective, safest, most peaceful way.

If you hate politics, you won't want to be involved.  If you aren't involved, you can't affect change, or affect status quo, whichever you prefer. 

Some politicians would love that fewer people are involved - from whom they tax and for whom they legislate.

If you are a citizen of the United States, you are part of the government (since a government cannot conduct its business without citizens....)... and because politics is the art and science of that government, you are in it. 

You can't hate politics, until you are dead and have no use for it (as you cease to be ruled over by people, and governments on earth).

And you shouldn't stay out of politics, unless you ignore your pay stub.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P.S. Find the letter Thomas Jefferson wrote to the Danbury Baptists in 1802 here (Library of Congress weblink below). He was adding his own words to the Amendment as an explanation. Taken out of context, it's gone crazy.  http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9806/danpre.html

P.P.S. Incidentally, if you are going to extol this separation idea as a virtue of Thomas Jefferson, can we talk about how he wrote exhaustively about the dangers of a country in debt (yes, even as he died a debtor)? Why do we hear about separation of church and state from his ONE letter and not about getting out of debt from his COUNTLESS letters?  Why is that not our rally cry?  Surely we can all agree about that?  Let's not rob from Peter to pay Paul.  Or rob from Hu Jintao to pay America.

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Pork - the Other Fiscal Meat

We were served a bit of pork in the fiscal cliff deal and I can't stomach it.

Well, that's not all true.  I like some of it! [The following are taken from a FOX News report.  Don't judge me.] 

I like the $59 million tax credit for algae growers to develop biofuel out of that abudant energy source.

I like the $7 million for electric motorcycle developers (but keep in mind, in my world, I would just buy an electric motorcycle!  I wouldn't make someone else pay for what I want!).

I know a lot of people who will ADORE the $78 million tax break for a racetrack for NASCAR.  While I am not one of them, oh well. 

In the wake of Sandy Hook, though, I especially have indigestion when it comes to the special expensing rule allowing and extra $222 million for Hollywood.

Why?  First, because these leaders proclaim to want to redistribute wealth with their power.  Uh, don't know if you have noticed, but Hollywood already has quite a bit of wealth. 

So, first because they are being hypocritical according to their own tenets.

Secondly, because I do believe the things on TV are influencing little brains that turn into big brains, and I'd rather not finance that with my family's tax money.  I pay Netflix every month.  And even that plan varies by our home budget allowance each month. I don't want to pay taxes for the films I choose not to watch! Come on!!

But since I sit in my home, and Congress sits in, well, CONGRESS, I guess, sure, take more of my family's money for your special projects.  I guess that is how it works.

The hard truth is that is THE way Congress can get things passed.  Just do your own research on how Republicans voted in favor of passing the Democrats' health care bill.  One would ask how Republicans voted for something so obviously big government.  The answer is pork, and it will shock you.

So, cheers!  Pork's for dinner tonight, somewhere.  And tomorrow night, and the next night, and the next...  While my family is frugally eating mac 'n cheese, some will be dining on their choice of meat.  Enjoy!

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Avoided-Fiscal-Cliff Hangover


It's January 2.  The country is still on a path to live beyond our means as a nation.  Many politicians besides Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles still are afraid to express what needs to be expressed.  STAND OUT for speaking truth, rather than being cowered under fear.  The bill that got passed last night was silly, not to mention a can kicked down the road.  More chillingly, the House and Senate and President waited till the eleventh hour.  Why?  I am not pointing fingers.  This indecision and insecurity is on everyone's shoulders.

Anyway, let's do some dictionary dancing.  I was inspired by listening to the Professor talk down to his students last night.
1) Define "balanced."  As of this month, it has two different meanings.  Obama last night expressed very clearly that he would like a balance between more spending and investment.  That's hilarious!  Both mean to spend more!  The other side believes it means having somewhat equal income with what we spend - so when one side goes up, the other side must also.  But to bring down one side, the other side must go down as well.  That definition is dying.

2) Define "rich."  As of this month, it means those earning over $400,000 or $450,000 as a couple.  What's to say that won't change?  It can easily be adjusted downward, until suddenly, those who voted to "tax the rich! tax the rich!" ARE the rich.  That 2%? It will shrink, don't worry.  It won't exist.  And then who can the government tax more to pay for its appetite?  You.  This is how it happens, folks.  Do not covet from (or hate) those who have more than you.  Truly.  It is dangerous.

Please understand.  I love the government.  I love to study it, it's fascinating.  But also having studied organizations at length (yes, for a master's degree, but also because they have so much impact on my life), I can tell you the single most driving force of any organization, but especially one so large, is to sustain itself and grow.  The problem is, this government has a check and balance among its different arms but not on the greater entity itself.  I no longer think "the public" is as powerful as it likes to think it is.

If you would like to pray for our leaders - yes, all of them - try this link.  It is helping me a great deal.  Prayer changes things (including us!):
http://www.2heartsnetwork.org/politics.htm
Educents.com